There is a peculiar blindness that afflicts the modern church. It is not the blindness of outright unbelief — the pew is still occupied, the creed still recited, the hymns still sung. It is something quieter and in some ways more dangerous. It is the blindness of a people who affirm another world with their lips while living as though this one is all there is.
This was not always so. And it was not always so among God's people.
The men who wrote our Scriptures inhabited a cosmos that was thick with invisible presence. When Ezekiel sat among the exiles by the Chebar River and the heavens opened, he did not reach for metaphor. He reached for precision. He strained to describe what he saw — the living creatures, the wheels within wheels, the eyes, the fire, the overwhelming glory — with the careful language of a witness who knows he is reporting something real. "The likeness of," he says repeatedly. "The appearance of." Not because he doubts the reality, but because the reality exceeds his vocabulary. This is not a man mythologizing. This is a man trying to be accurate about something that actually happened.
Isaiah in the Temple. Daniel by the Tigris. John on Patmos. These were not men who experienced the supernatural as an interruption to normal life. They were men whose understanding of normal life already included the active presence of an invisible world — a world populated with beings of enormous power, governed by a God who sat enthroned above it all, and intersecting with human history at every point.
This was not unique to the prophets. It was the assumed cosmology of the entire biblical world.
The ancient Israelite farmer did not need to be convinced that invisible forces were at work in his harvest, his family, his nation. The question was never whether such forces existed. The question was which ones were being attended to, and whether Israel was faithful to the One who stood above all others. The Deuteronomy 32 worldview — in which the nations were parceled out to lesser divine beings while Israel remained the LORD's own portion — was not advanced theology reserved for scholars. It was the water everyone swam in.
This same porousness persisted well into the Christian era, and nowhere more naturally than among rural peoples whose daily lives kept them close to the unmediated texture of created reality. My own Celtic ancestors — the Welsh, the Britons, the broader family of peoples who received the gospel early and held it in their particular way — carried an intuition that the boundary between the visible and invisible was thin, and that certain places and times made that thinness felt. They called them thin places. And they did not mean it as poetry.
They meant it as geography.
A farmer watching the weather knows he is not in control. A fisherman reading the sea knows the same. A people who bury their dead in the hillside and plant their crops by the season and lose children to fever in the night — these are people who have never been tempted to mistake the visible world for a closed system. Dependence was not a theological concept to be argued. It was a daily experience to be navigated.
Into that world the gospel arrived not as a disruption of the supernatural but as its clarification. The invisible world was real — but it was now interpreted. The powers were real — but they were named and ranked and shown to be subordinate. The thin places were real — but the One who made himself known in them had now spoken finally and fully in his Son. Celtic Christianity did not abandon the supernatural worldview of its pre-Christian past. It baptized it, corrected it, and gave it a center.
The result was a faith that was robustly, unselfconsciously supernatural. Not credulous — the Celtic church produced serious theologians and serious monks. But operating on a map of reality in which the invisible world was always present, always active, and never far.
That world is largely gone from the modern church. How it was lost is a story worth telling. But before we tell it, we need to feel the weight of what was there — and what we are missing.
The biblical authors were not naive. They were not pre-scientific primitives who would have known better if they had access to our knowledge. They were witnesses. And what they witnessed was a world far larger, far more populated, and far more alive than the one most modern Christians functionally inhabit.
We were meant to live in that world too.
No comments:
Post a Comment